<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Think Retirement</title>
        <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/</link>
        <description>Early? Semi? Won&apos;t? Can&apos;t? - Health Care - Social Security - Lifestyle - Politics - What does it mean to you?</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:46:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
        
        <item>
            <title>Romney Steps Out</title>
            <description><![CDATA[So it's John McCain.  It's not official, but there seems to be no way the remaining candidates (Huckabee) can overcome the momentum that McCain has attained.   <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Now that McCain has come out on top, we'll be looking at his positions on retirement issues to see what if anything changes as the message is tuned to beat the Democratic nominee.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>At the point where Mitt Romney withdrew his candidacy, he had no votes in our poll.  It was curious.  For as much visibility he had as a top contender and the money spent on his campaign, no votes at all indicated little interest in his message, from our point of view.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/02/romney-steps-out.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/02/romney-steps-out.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Presidential Race</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Presidential</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 16:46:05 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Filing for Social Security Benefits</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div>Seems that articles have been appearing with increasing frequency, outlining the rules for filing for Social Security Benefits.  If you haven't checked them lately, it's worth looking into, even if you aren't ready to retire in the near future.  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>The basics are that you can file for partial benefits when you reach the age of 62.  Depending on when you were born, you can file for full benefits when you are 65, 66, or 67.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Many people wonder whether they should consider filing for partial benefits, or wait to file for full benefits.  You need to know which rules apply to you in order to know your options.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>We've included links to a story in the <a href="http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">Burlington Free Press</span></a>, and here's a link to the official Social Security <a href="http://www.socialsecurity.gov/planners/calculators.htm">benefit calculator</a>.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>From the Burlington Free Press</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; white-space: pre; "> Burlington Free Press.com | Living</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; white-space: pre;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 16px; line-height: 18px; white-space: normal; "><a href="http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080204/LIVING/802040315/1004">Deciphering when to file for Social Security</a></span></span></div><br /><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/02/filing-for-social-security-ben.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/02/filing-for-social-security-ben.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Retirement</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Social Security</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Retirement</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Social Security</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 10:31:04 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Bush&apos;s Medicare Funding Decrease</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>A story in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/washington/31budget.html?sq=bush%20hospital&amp;st=nyt&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;scp=3&amp;adxnnlx=1201881989-zd/jzZFpVGPl3fa0FAPsTQ">NYT</a> is the basis of a post that discusses President Bush's proposed cuts in payments to hospitals.  They are pretty serious cuts in future funding, and the logic of the proposal is suspect, because it appears that private insurance is expected to make up the shortfall.  We, and others, doubt that will happen.  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>The writer goes on to use this as an example of how bad it would be if Hillary Clinton's, or what he refers to as "Beltway Idiots" plans for health care succeed.  We get the connection, but using a Bush plan as an example of how it's bad for the government to be responsible for anything would potentially have us take all responsibility for everything away from government.  When an administration has low approval ratings like Bush-Cheney, and a track record for being wrong on predicting the outcome of their actions, one can forget that it doesn't have to be that way.  In our history, we have had governments from both parties that, however briefly, had our best interests at heart, acted accordingly and gave us government that worked.   </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>We hope the candidates from both parties remember that, during the campaign, and after.</div><div><br /></div>
<div>From <a href="http://www.healthcarebs.com">healthcarebs.com</a></div>
<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; white-space: pre; ">Health Care BS - BUSH BOMBS AMERICA'S HOSPITALS</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; white-space: pre;"><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></span></div><a href="http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/02/01/bush-bombs-americas-hospitals/">http://www.healthcarebs.com/2008/02/01/bush-bombs-americas-hospitals/</a><br /><br />"Nationwide, well over half of the people who require hospital care are on Medicare and/or Medicaid. And, because hospitals lose money on these patients, they are in financial distress all across the country."]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/02/bushs-medicare-funding-decreas.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/02/bushs-medicare-funding-decreas.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Presidential Race</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Health Care</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Hospital</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 10:48:07 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Social Security Is Worth $225,000 for a Typical Retiree</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div>From the <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-weight: bold;">National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI)</span>:</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>NASI has released a report that includes comparison of the value of Social Security to equivalent private insurance policies, focusing on groups that are at higher risk of having inadequate funds.  The report consolidates information from 12 organizations, funded by the Ford Foundation. </div><div><br /></div><div>The press release has the highlights. If you have ever wondered what it would cost to have your own Social Security insurance, here it is.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><a href="http://www.nasi.org/publications2763/publications_show.htm?doc_id=659145">http://www.nasi.org/publications2763/publications_show.htm?doc_id=659145</a><br /><br /><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; white-space: pre; ">National Academy of Social Insurance - Publications</span><br />"WASHINGTON, DC - For most Americans, the value of their Social Security is the biggest accumulation of dollars they will take into retirement. In fact, for two-thirds of recipients over the age of 65, Social Security is more than half of their income during retirement, according to a new report released today by the non-partisan National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI)."</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/02/social-security-is-worth-22500.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/02/social-security-is-worth-22500.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Retirement</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Social Security</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Retirement</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Social Security</category>
            
            <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 08:59:14 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Entrepreneurship Myth</title>
            <description><![CDATA[A story published on <a href="http://www.businessweek.com">BusinessWeek.com</a>, about Scott Shane's forthcoming book <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">The Illusions of Entrepreneurship</span>, gives us a short description and an interview with the author.  

<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Entrepreneurs don't earn as much as they would if they worked for someone else.  That's the message.  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Most of the comments that accompany the story (so far) argue against Shane's conclusions, for a variety of reasons.  

The interview does point out some things anyone considering starting their own business should know, and do.  Nothing you won't find in many primers on startups, but it's good advice. It's the conclusion that seems to be causing a stir. 
</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>We wish we could give you a hotlink to the story, but <a href="http://www.businessweek.com">BusinessWeek.com</a> forbids the use of "deep links" on their site.  We aren't sure exactly why they don't want traffic from sites that find their content interesting, but whatever the reason, we don't want to violate their terms of use.  Can't even link to their terms of use (we suppose) so if you are interested, you'll have to find  your way there from their <a href="http://www.businessweek.com">home page</a>.  (others have also mentioned this <a href="http://technologyexpert.blogspot.com/2008/01/dont-link-to-us-business-week.html">here</a> and <a href="http://gawker.com/5002579/businessweek-doesnt-want-your-stinking-page-views">here</a>) 
</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>What do you think of Scott Shane's conclusion?  Entepreneurship is a component of many "retirement" plans these days. <a href="http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/-my-grandfather-worked-as.php">(See Susan Reid's post of 1/23)</a> Should we have second thoughts?

Send us a comment, and go to BusinessWeek and leave one there.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>FYI - You may "deep link" to any page on ThinkRetirement.  Be our guest!</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/the-entrepreneurship-myth.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/the-entrepreneurship-myth.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Lifestyle</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Retirement</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Entepreneurship</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Retirement</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:39:11 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>The Field Narrows</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Wow, you go away for a minute and look what happens.  Four players have left the field. <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Edwards, Giuliani, Kucinich and Hunter are gone.  We have a two person race to the finish on the Democratic side and what looks to be a battle between McCain and Romney, with Huckabee and Paul trying to be heard.  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Time to catch up.  We have fewer plans to evaluate for their positions on retirement issues, hopefully it will be easier to see the differences between their positions.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>The Candidate Poll has been revised.  If you voted for any of the candidates that have withdrawn, please vote again.  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>More later...</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/the-field-narrows.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/the-field-narrows.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Presidential Race</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Campaign 2008</category>
            
            <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 11:30:46 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Don&apos;t Give Out Your Social Security Number</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Seems this warning can't be said often enough.&nbsp; <br /><br />Hardly any reputable agency or business will ever ask for your Social Security Number online via email or on an unsecured Web site.&nbsp; Those that do still require some caution, but you should know if you have logged into a secure account on a site where you conduct business that requires that kind of identification.&nbsp; <br /><br /><b>If you aren't sure, don't do it.</b>&nbsp; <br /><br />Here's a recent article posted on the <i>Seattle Times</i> site.&nbsp; Take a look.&nbsp; The people out there trying to succeed at identity theft are coming up with new tricks all of the time.&nbsp; <br /><br /><a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2004146199_ptinbo26.html">http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2004146199_ptinbo26.html</a> ]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/dont-give-out-your-social-secu.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/dont-give-out-your-social-secu.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Security</category>
            
            <pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:31:25 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Is Retirement Even Relevant Anymore For Midlife Entrepreneurs?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<i>This is a guest post from</i> <a href="http://www.alkamae.com/">Dr. Susan L. Reid</a>.  <i>What does "retirement" mean to a person who has successfully woven a passion into their life as an occupation. <span style="color:red;">Comments were not functioning properly on 1/24.  If you would like to comment, please try again.</span></i> <br /><hr><br />My grandfather worked as an electrician up until the day he died, he was 98. My father worked as an expert psychological witness up until three months before his passing. What about me? What will I do? I expect I will do the same. Why? Because I am an entrepreneur, as were my father and grandfather before me. They enjoyed their work, found meaning and value in what they did, and were passionate about making a difference in the world. Me, too.
<br /><br /><b>The Changing Face of Retirement</b>
<br /><br />Retirement, and how we view retirement, has changed dramatically since the beginning of the 20th century. Particularly since WWII when pension plans became standard offerings to U.S. workers. Prior to that, most workers continued working until their death, relying on personal savings and family support to sustain them. 
<br /><br />While 65 is considered the normal retirement age in the U.S., many midlife entrepreneurs eschew that age, preferring instead to remain actively involved in their businesses, well into their 80s. And entrepreneurship among seniors is growing! Nearly half the country's self-employed workers — 7.4 million — are Baby Boomers, reports the U.S. Department of Labor.  
<br /><br />People turning 50 today have about half their lives ahead of them, and each year more than four million men and women join their ranks. So, what is retirement, then? Is it the time when you stop work completely or is it the time when you retire from one job and begin another? Does it begin at a certain age or depend on the number of years you have served in a specific capacity? Is it based on your physical condition or your personal choice?
<br /><br />Today retirement is what you make it. The Baby Boomer generation is redefining retirement, shunning the conventional traditions of stopping, ceasing, and leaving in favor of staying involved, continuing to contribute, and following their passion. That’s why it makes sense to be a midlife entrepreneur.   
<br /><br /><b>10 Reasons for Being a Midlife Entrepreneur</b>
<br /><br /><blockquote><ol><li>You’re healthier and living longer.
</li><li>You want to stay involved and engaged.
</li><li>You enjoy generating extra income.
</li><li>You get to build a business around something you enjoy and are passionate about.
</li><li>You have a full rolodex and 20-30 years of experience to back you.
</li><li>You want the independence and flexibility that comes from working for yourself. 
</li><li>You have confidence and experience, and know what you’re good at.
</li><li>You may already have a pool of money saved to help finance your business.
</li><li>You can do business from home, using the Internet as your storefront.
</li><li>You aren’t discriminated against because of your age.
</li></ol></blockquote><br />If you are in your 40s or 50s, you’ve already begun to think about retirement. But what is retirement? Is it a stopping point or a place to start? An ending or a beginning?  
<br /><br />What are your thoughts on retirement? Does it make sense to you to be a midlife entrepreneur?<br /><br /><br />

<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="SRheadshot72dpi.jpg" src="http://www.thinkretirement.com/images/SRheadshot72dpi.jpg" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt; float: left;" height="155" width="128" /></span>
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="InnerSamurai_small.jpg" src="http://www.thinkretirement.com/images/InnerSamurai_small.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 20px 20px; float: right;" height="155" /></span><br />


Dr. Susan L. Reid is a Small Business Start Up Coach, Consultant, Online Accidental Prenher™ and author of <a href="http://www.wmebooks.com/Discovering_Your_Inner_Samurai_by_Susan_L_Reid_p/1934229059.htm">Discovering Your Inner Samurai: The Entrepreneurial Woman's Journey to Business Success</a> <div><br /></div><div>ThinkRetirement is but one stop on Susan's Virtual Book Tour.  Visit <a href="http://windsormedia.blogs.com/books/VBT-susan-l-reid.html">WME Books</a> to see the tour itinerary and see where she's been and where she's going!<br /><br />Susan's main site is <a href="http://www.alkamae.com/">Alkamae.com</a>.  Check out her <a href="http://susanreid.typepad.com/">blog</a>.<br /><br />You can buy <a href="http://www.wmebooks.com/Discovering_Your_Inner_Samurai_by_Susan_L_Reid_p/1934229059.htm">Discovering Your Inner Samurai: The Entrepreneurial Woman's Journey to Business Success</a> directly from WME Books. <span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="buyfromwme_lg.gif" src="http://www.thinkretirement.com/images/buyfromwme_lg.gif" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="34" width="115" /></span>Or, through Amazon.com.<br /></div><div align="center"><iframe src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=wwwdeadbluesg-20&amp;o=1&amp;p=8&amp;l=as1&amp;asins=1934229059&amp;fc1=000000&amp;IS2=1&amp;lt1=_blank&amp;lc1=0000FF&amp;bc1=000000&amp;bg1=FFFFFF&amp;f=ifr" style="width: 120px; height: 240px;" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/-my-grandfather-worked-as.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/-my-grandfather-worked-as.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Lifestyle</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Retirement</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Lifestyle</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Retirement</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:57:34 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title> Retirement Real Estate - Deals Around the Corner?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div>With all the news media buzzing about Recession, predictions of a crumbling real estate market, and questions about who is going to fix it all and how soon, we got to wondering if there would be a corresponding uptick in opportunites to buy retirement housing at lower prices?  Moving to a retirement community in Florida is the goal of many, so we looked on the Internet for someone who might know and came up with the following entry on Topretirements.com.   It would appear that the prices have not begun to fall significantly across the board, but there are some sellers and realtors who want to move their property and are lowering their prices accordingly.  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Two recent driving trips through Florida, from Jacksonville to Key West (and back) support the article's suggestion that there is plenty of real estate to be had.  Our own observations are that properties that have been on the market for over two years are often still listed at the same price as the initial listing, or only slightly less.  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>The real opportunities may still be out there.  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>(If you can sell the home you have, and move... another topic for another time)   </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; white-space: pre; "><a href="http://www.topretirements.com/blog/">Retirement community news blog</a> - Topretirements</span></div><a href="http://www.topretirements.com/blog/">http://www.topretirements.com/blog/</a><br /><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/retirement-real-estate-are-dea.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/retirement-real-estate-are-dea.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Real Estate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Retirement</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Real Estate</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Retirement</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:39:22 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>CNN says &quot;Everybody seems to agree&quot;  -  Really?  This doesn&apos;t help.</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div>MediaMatters.org draws attention to a report on The Situation Room, where the storyline is based on the assumption that Social Security will run out in 2041, contrary to government reports that refute that claim.  The story goes on with reporting on how various Presidential Candidates will address the issue.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Is it spin, or just bad reporting on CNN's part?  It's one thing for a television "news" show with a particular point of view to spin a story the way they want, using unsubstantiated fears as a pivot to leverage opinion.  Hopefully,most of us can see those shows and "news reports" for what they really are, but what is this?</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>We seriously doubt whether "Everybody knows" and "Voter's know" would never qualify as substantiation for a story in any journalism course.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>It doesn't help the dialogue and certainly doesn't serve the public interest for our news outlets to crank out stories that aren't supported by facts they can cite.  It's called "fact checking" and it used to be a requisite part of reporting.  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Take a look at the video linked on the <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230001?f=h_latest">mediamatters.org</a> page.   </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>It's not like there aren't some real issues that need to be addressed in terms of the viability of Social Security and it's funding, but the scare tactic that it's going to run out of funds and that everyone knows that to be true is simply unprofessional for someone who thinks of themselves as a journalist.   </div><div>    </div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; white-space: pre;">Media Matters - CNN's Chernoff  falsely claimed Social Security <br />will "be out of money in  2041"  </span></div><a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230001?f=h_latest">http://mediamatters.org/items/200801230001?f=h_latest</a><br /><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/cnn-says-everybody-seems-to-ag.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/cnn-says-everybody-seems-to-ag.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Social Security</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Social Security</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:06:27 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Guest Blogger Tomorrow</title>
            <description><![CDATA[Check here tomorrow. &nbsp;<a href="http://www.alkamae.com/">Dr. Susan Reid</a>, author of "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px;"><a href="http://www.wmebooks.com/Discovering_Your_Inner_Samurai_by_Susan_L_Reid_p/1934229059.htm">Discovering Your Inner Samurai: The Entrepreneurial Woman's Journey to Business Success,"</a></span>&nbsp;will be our guest blogger as part of her Virtual Book Tour. &nbsp;<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>We are excited to have Dr. Reid as our guest and look forward to her insights into "retirement."<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/guest-blogger-tomorrow.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/guest-blogger-tomorrow.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Retirement</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Lifestyle</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Susan Reid</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:18:39 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Should Health Care be a Privilege or a Right?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[A post on the DMI blog about Monday's Democratic Debate in South Carolina, points out that the term "universal" when applied to the candidate's health care plans is not to be construed to mean that everyone will be covered.  Universal does not equate to everyone, and does not mean that everyone has a "right" to health care.  The post points out that only Dennis Kucinich proposes that health care be a right.  The other plans attempt to make it "more available," if you can pay for it, or find someone else (employer) to pay for it.  Estimates are that 15 million people in the US will remain uninsured.<div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>From a retirement perspective, health care costs can rapidly deplete retirement savings, and access to good health care coverage becomes more difficult as one ages.  Medicare is there, but many retired persons augment Medicare with additional coverage obtained from private insurers.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>The next administration will face big challenges in the health care arena.  How effective they will be in changing the status-quo will depend on where they are coming from.<br /><div><br /></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; white-space: pre; ">Presidential Candidates Are Not Serious About Protecting<br />Our Health | DMI Blog</span></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><a href="http://www.dmiblog.com/archives/2008/01/presidential_candidates_are_no.html">http://www.dmiblog.com/archives/2008/01/presidential_candidates_are_no.html</a></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/should-health-care-be-a-privil.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/should-health-care-be-a-privil.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Presidential Race</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Health Care</category>
            
            <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:52:45 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Fred Thompson Withdraws</title>
            <description><![CDATA[AP is reporting Fred Thompson's withdrawal from the 2008 Presidential race.  No Endorsement at this time. <div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/T/THOMPSON_2008?SITE=OHCIN&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT">Associated Press - Thompson Quits</a></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Note: The Fred Thompson votes in our informal poll on the candidates will be removed from the results.  If you voted for Fred Thompson, you may cast your vote for one of the remaining candidates.</div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/fred-thompson-withdraws.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/fred-thompson-withdraws.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Presidential Race</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Thompson</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:32:12 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Center Stage for Differences in Health Care Plans </title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div>The Democratic Candidate debate in South Carolina pushed the subject of health care reform to the point where the differences in the three major candidates proposals become more evident.  It's easy to think they are all basically the same in sound bites, but there are differences, and the opportunity for the candidates to explain that to the public, even if the discussion becomes combative, is welcomed. </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Much is being made of the confrontation that took place between Clinton and Obama in the debate last night, and perhaps we saw something of the character and tenacity of all three of the participants.  Beyond that, the real education was in the subject of the discussions and the health care plans were part of it. </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Here's a brief article from <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">Rolling Stone</span> on the subject, as we find more detailed arcticles on the debate and the issues, they will be posted.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/index.php/2008/01/22/redefining-universal-health-care-clintons-big-win/">http://www.rollingstone.com/nationalaffairs/index.php/2008/01/22/redefining-universal-health-care-clintons-big-win/<br /></a><br /><div>Here's an older article from the <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">Washington Post Blog</span> on the differences between the Clinton and Obama plans.</div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div><a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2007/11/clinton_vs_obama_on_health_car.html">http://blog.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/2007/11/clinton_vs_obama_on_health_car.html</a></div>]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/center-stage-for-differences-i.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/center-stage-for-differences-i.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Health Care</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Presidential Race</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Barack Obama</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Campaign 2008</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Health Care</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Hillary Clinton</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">John Edwards</category>
            
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:38:35 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
        <item>
            <title>Amend Title II of the Social Security Act?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<div>Kentucky Senator Johnny Ray Turner has filed a Senate Resolution to amend Title II of the Social Security Act, to repeal provisions that limit or reduce benefits for public sector employees that receive pension or social security benefits that come from employment outside of their government employment.  Teachers, in particular, are affected by this.  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>Should Government worker benefits be reduced because they worked additional jobs to augment their income?  </div><div><br class="webkit-block-placeholder" /></div><div>From - <span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Arial; font-size: 18px; font-weight: bold; white-space: pre; ">WKYT - WYMT News  57 Mountain News Homepage </span></div><div><br /></div><div>"<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10px; line-height: 15px; ">The National Education Association estimates that 300,000 individuals are losing an average of $3,600 a year due to the Government Pension</span></div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(68, 68, 68); font-family: Verdana; font-size: 10px; line-height: 15px; "><p>Offset provision.</p><p>Turner said the Windfall Elimination provision impacts the teaching profession because people are less likely to leave other careers in which they earn Social Security benefits to become educators.</p><p>The Government Pension Offset and Windfall Elimination provisions have the severest effect on widowed lower-income women who have worked hard for years and can least afford reduced benefits."</p><p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(51, 51, 51); font-family: arial; font-size: 13px; line-height: normal; "><a href="http://www.wkyt.com/wymtnews/headlines/13947622.html">http://www.wkyt.com/wymtnews/headlines/13947622.html</a></span></p></span><br />]]></description>
            <link>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/amend-title-ii-of-the-social-s.php</link>
            <guid>http://www.thinkretirement.com/2008/01/amend-title-ii-of-the-social-s.php</guid>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">General</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Retirement</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Social Security</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Taxes</category>
            
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Retirement</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Social Security</category>
            
                <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Taxes</category>
            
            <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:50:42 -0500</pubDate>
        </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>
